Jul
07
2008
Today
 .

Hijri Date


Member Login

Attock News Video

 Daily Cartoon

Attock News Funny SMS

 Attock Urdu News

guest book

Attock Forum

WEB Links

Attock Poll

Maj. Tahir Sadiq is ....

Attock Weather

Attock
25°C

Tell a Friend

Like what you see? If you like what you see, please tell a friend or family member about us! It's simple! Just click on the Tell a Friend hotlink below

Court censures Attock police for erecting roadblocks PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 
 


attock policeThe Attock district and sessions judge has directed the police not to erect hurdles and obstacles for preventing movement of lawyers and others in future, without legal authority, as it is against the law and citizens’ rights.

The judge, Chaudhry Muhammad Yunus, issued these directives on the petition of the president of the district bar association (DBA), Rana Afsar Ali Khan, filed against the Attock district police officer (DPO) and the Attock city police SHO.

DPO Attock PoliceThis ‘roads closure case’ petition was filed through a seven- member council, comprising advocates Sadaqat Ali Khan, Sheikh Ehsanuddin, Bashir Paracha, Sheikh Hameed Anwar, Abid Altaf, Chaudhry Akhtar and Waqar Azeem.

The court, in its short verdict, told the DPO and SHO (respondents) that they were not above the law and should restrict their actions within the limits prescribed by rules and regulations, as creating unnecessary hurdles in the movement of any citizen without any legal validity, was a violation of the law. Therefore, they must avoid indulging in such illegal acts in future, the court added.

Earlier, on the notice of the court, the Attock city police SHO, Abdul Hafeez Ohlukh, appeared before the court to explain his position.

On the court’s query, he said the obstacles had been erected on the Attock DPO’s verbal orders, to restrict movement of lawyers from proceeding to the capital.
he court, however, turned down his plea, saying that verbal orders had no legal validity.

The petitioner, Mr Khan, had informed the court in his prayer on Friday that the SHO, on the behest of the DPO created hurdles in the peaceful movement of lawyers, and other commuters, by blocking roads without any legal authority to restrict them from travelling to Islamabad, each time the hearing of the Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry reference is held.

In addition to this, he said, the police adopted a humiliating and insulting attitude towards lawyers, in particular and other people, in general, on such occasions.

The police also chased their vehicles and detained them illegally for long hours, which was a an example of the abuse of the official powers of the police.

The petitioner termed these police acts illegal and violative of citizens’ rights and argued that the court should take legal action against the concerned officials for their highhandedness.

The Attock DBA president and other lawyers hailed the court’s verdict, as it would curtail the abusive powers of the police and keep them in check to guarantee freedom of movement to lawyers and other commuters.
15-05-2007 16:07 Our Correspondent
Quote this article in websiteFavouredPrintSend to friendRelated articlesSave this to del.icio.us
This entry was posted on 15-05-2007 16:07. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. This article was favoured 18 time. You can leave a comment. Tags: highhandedness, humiliating, petitioner, travelling, authority, commuters, concerned, guarantee, illegally, insulting, islamabad, occasions, officials, president, reference, violative, addition, attitude, blocking, chaudhry, citizens, detained, iftikhar, informed, mohammad, movement, official, peaceful, restrict, validity, vehicles, abusive, adopted, created, curtail, freedom, hearing, however, hurdles, illegal, justice, lawyers, towards, verdict, without, action, argued, attock, behest, chased, . Last update on 05-06-2008 17:29
Views: 11780    
Users' Comments (1)RSS feed comment
Average user rating
   (0 vote)

Posted by Khurram Rasheed, Singapore
21-07-2007 20:19, IP 155.69.2.5, Guest
 
Nothing of worth on the part of the cour
I wonder why did not the court call the DPO? It is pretty obvious that he holds the sole responsibility of any action taken by the district police... 
It is further clarified from the stance of the SHO in the court..... 
Is it practical for a junior to demand for written version of every order passed by seniors? i seriously doubt...and surprised to see that the judge is unaware of the real life situations.
 
» Report this comment to administrator
 

Comment an article
  Name
  E-mail
   Title
 Notify me of follow-up comments
This image contains a scrambled text, it is using a combination of colors, font size, background, angle in order to disallow computer to automate reading. You will have to reproduce it to post on my homepage
Enter what you see:

< Prev   Next >